2007年10月4日 星期四

reflection

At first, when I read through the essay, I feel the author is brutal and blindness. He shots the squirrel just for fun, and he does not have pity for the torture which the squirrel is suffered. On the contrary, he gives the squirrel another deadly shot. In his concept, if he can kill an animal successfully, he will not scare anymore when he goes to the war. Therefore, he conquers his fearfulness and takes another chance- to learn how to kill a chicken. When I read his article, I can almost imagine the scene because he describes it so vividly. Not only I but also my classmates are feel it is so disgusting and cruel. For example, the chicken can not bear the torture anymore and it will run away with out its head. This makes me think of does human has the right to deprive other creature’s lives. Should we kill those poor animals just for our dinner or they are so delicious. Hence, I am absolutely support everyone should quit eating meat and be a vegetarian. Furthermore, I am sneer at the author’s concept. Why he thinks kill a man is as easy as kill an animal? Killing men is committed a crime and even genocide. However, when I think of the era which writer lives, I consider everyone is easily affected by the period they live. As a consequence, the writer is so concentrate on learning how to kill.

沒有留言: